Eddie Hearn's latest attempt to add a blockbuster fight to the boxing calendar has hit a snag, with Gervonta Davis publicly rejecting an offer to fight Conor Benn. The crux of the matter seems to lie in the financial details, with Davis airing his grievances on X (formerly Twitter), labeling Hearn's $10 million offer, plus PPV and gate receipt upsides, as inadequate and accusing the promoter of attempting to shortchange him.
Hearn's offer, laid out in what he hoped would be the start of fruitful negotiations, has instead led to a very public spat. Davis' response, sharp and unyielding, suggests a deep mistrust in the financial fairness of the proposed deal. Hearn, for his part, seems baffled by Davis' outright rejection and lack of willingness to even discuss the offer further, hinting at a possible misunderstanding or miscommunication about the potential earnings from PPV and gate receipts.
This standoff isn't just about numbers; it's a glimpse into the intricate dance of boxing negotiations, where ego, reputation, and financial interests often clash. Hearn's insistence on the reasonableness of the offer and his call for a sit-down conversation points to a desire to bridge the gap. However, Davis' public dismissal of the offer as an attempt to "cheat" him out of his rightful earnings indicates a hard road ahead for any potential agreement.
What's your take on the Hearn-Davis standoff? Is Davis right to be wary of the financial terms, or should he take Hearn up on his offer to discuss the deal further? Could this public negotiation tactic affect the potential for future fights? Share your thoughts and opinions in the comments below.
Comments