.png)
The playful feud between Hasbulla Magomedov and Abdu Rozik has captured the internet’s attention, turning these two social media sensations into viral icons with millions of fans worldwide. With Hasbulla, standing at 3 feet 4 inches due to a rare form of dwarfism caused by a growth hormone deficiency, and Rozik, who is 3 feet 1 inch and contends with a condition called rickets that results in fragile bones from vitamin D deficiency, their playful banter and mock fighting have kept fans endlessly entertained. But as the two have joked about fighting, fans took it one step further, calling for an actual showdown—possibly even in Dana White’s Power Slap league.
However, the UFC president himself was having none of it. When recently asked if he’d entertain a slapfight between Hasbulla and Rozik, White responded bluntly: “But do we really want to see those dudes fight? I mean, come on. Come on.” He took a humorous, but clearly dismissive, stance, jokingly calling out the media: “Y’all are sick f*cking individuals, okay? Every one of you in this room.” White’s final word? “No, sir. The answer is no, I would not make those guys fight.”
Why Hasbulla vs Abdu Feels So Intriguing
Hasbulla vs Abdul's appeal comes largely from their unique personalities and the obvious light-hearted nature of their interactions. From playful shoves to social media “trash talk,” the two have become icons in their own right. For fans, the idea of an actual fight between them isn’t about brutality—it’s about the sheer curiosity of seeing these two popular figures finally face off.
The Ethical Debate: Harmless Fun or Exploitation?
While some argue it’s all in good fun, others, including Dana White, view such a matchup as pushing ethical boundaries. Is it really right to pit these two against each other for entertainment? There are fans who say that a controlled, light-hearted exhibition might even empower Hasbulla and Rozik, allowing them to take control of their playful rivalry on their own terms. Yet others fear the fight could open a door to exploitation, drawing attention to the individuals' conditions rather than their personalities and talents.
Is Dana Right to Shut It Down?
As the president of an organization known for fierce fights and physical endurance, White is usually a fan of settling rivalries in the ring. But with Hasbulla and Rozik, he’s made it clear that drawing lines is essential—even when fans are begging for it. White’s stance reflects a broader question: is there a line we should draw in sports entertainment?
It’s ultimately up to fans to consider where that line lies and if they’d feel comfortable with a matchup between these two. So, what do you think? Is it as Dana says—too much—or do Hasbulla and Rozik deserve the chance to put on a show in a fun, safe format that’s more spectacle than sport?
Comments