.png)
Chris Weidman Criticizes The UFC's Policies
Chris Weidman, former UFC Middleweight Champion and one of MMA’s most respected veterans, found himself in an all-too-familiar predicament. Scheduled to fight Eryk Anders at UFC 309, Weidman saw his bout canceled when Anders pulled out due to undisclosed reasons. While these last-minute changes are unfortunately common in the sport, the aftermath has left Weidman—and many fans—questioning the UFC’s stance on fighter compensation.
Weidman requested his show money, the base amount typically paid to fighters who show up and make weight, despite the fight not happening. However, the UFC declined, citing a policy of consistency. According to Weidman, the UFC’s reasoning was clear: “If we paid people to not fight… this happens on like 40% of the cards.”
A Pattern of Discontent
This issue isn't new. Weidman’s brother-in-law, Stephen "Wonderboy" Thompson, was denied his full show money after Michel Pereira missed weight ahead of their UFC 291 bout in 2023. Although Thompson reportedly received partial compensation, he, like Weidman, expressed frustration over the financial strain fighters endure during camp only to walk away empty-handed when their opponent fails to show up.
Weidman highlighted this financial strain during his interview on The Ariel Helwani Show:
“I showed up, you guys had that on the budget sheet to begin with, you guys had a great night, why do you keep that money and I don’t?”
What’s at Stake?
Fighters don’t just show up on fight night. A training camp can last 8-12 weeks and includes intense physical preparation, nutrition plans, weight cuts, and countless hours of sparring. Media obligations during fight week add to the burden. Each of these elements costs time, money, and often, the fighters' health.
Not compensating fighters for their efforts when a bout falls apart feels, to many, like an industry failure. Show money serves as a safeguard for fighters to cover training costs and maintain financial stability in a volatile profession.
Should the UFC Reconsider Its Policy?
While the UFC argues that paying show money across the board would set a problematic precedent, there’s another way to look at it. What happens if fighters are paid even when their opponents pull out?
Better Morale: Fighters would be more willing to accept bouts knowing their hard work won’t go unpaid.
Stronger Loyalty: A fairer system could improve fighter retention and loyalty, reducing high-profile complaints.
Financial Security: Fighters wouldn’t risk going broke when unforeseen circumstances arise.
If 40% of fight cards experience changes, the UFC should consider whether maintaining consistency at the fighters' expense is worth the damage to its reputation.
The Bigger Picture
As MMA evolves, so too should fighter compensation policies. If the UFC doesn’t adjust its stance, it risks alienating the very athletes who bring fans through the gates. Weidman, Thompson, and countless others deserve better. It’s not just about fighting in the cage—it’s about fairness outside it.
How long will fighters continue to show up without knowing if they’ll be paid? The UFC’s answer may determine the future of fighter satisfaction—and loyalty—in the organization.
What do you think? Should fighters be paid their show money if their opponent pulls out? Let us know in the comments!